Advertising has grown to be an industry worth many
billions of dollars across the world. Online advertising alone is believed to
be worth $24 billion a year. Almost all public space has some advertisements in
sight and all forms of media, from newspapers to the cinema, are also filled
with adverts. Whilst this helps companies sell their products, and helps
consumers to learn what is on offer, many believe that this huge amount of
advertising can be harmful. It may make people want too much, or things that
they cannot have, or it might make them feel inadequate when they don't have
something. Research shows that children can be particularly open to these kinds
of risk.
There are too many advertisements in everyday life. | |
POINT
|
COUNTERPOINT
|
The
sheer volume of advertising in our society is incredible. You cannot watch
television, ride on a bus or even walk down the street without someone trying
to sell you something or inform you of something. Recent research suggests
people living in a city today sees up to 5,000 advertisements a day. 50% of
those surveyed said they thought 'advertising today was out of control'.
People shouldn't have to go about their lives having their minds saturated
with such a vast quantity of, in most cases, redundant and profiteering
information. They should be able to go about their daily lives in peace
without being forced to watch, listen or view an advertisement.
|
Though
there are a great many advertisements in everyday life, there are not so many
that they can't simply be ignored. Advertisements attempt to get you to buy a
product, if you're not interested, then don't buy the product. For every
person who finds all the advertisements stressful, another person finds them
enjoyable and something to read or watch while they make their daily journey
to work or school. Out of control could mean simply that customers think
businesses are spending too much on advertising. Without proof that the
number of advertisements is having a negative effect, the point is worthless.
|
People are given too much choice, which makes them less happy. | |
POINT
|
COUNTERPOINT
|
Advertising
leads to many people being overwhelmed by the endless need to decide between
competing demands on their attention – this is known as the tyranny of choice
or choice overload. Recent research suggests that people are on average less
happy than they were 30 years ago - despite being better off and having much
more choice of things to spend their money on. The claims of adverts crowd in
on people, raising expectations about a product and leading to inevitable
disappointment after it is bought. A recent advertisement for make-up was
banned in Britain due to the company presenting its product as being more
effective than it actually was. Shoppers feel that a poor purchase is their
fault for not choosing more wisely, and regret not choosing something else
instead. Some people are so overwhelmed that they cannot choose at all.
|
People
are unhappy because they can't have everything, not because they are given
too much choice and find it stressful. In fact, advertisements play a crucial
role in ensuring that what money people have, they spend on the most
appropriate product for themselves. If advertisements were not permitted,
people would waste money on an initial product when, given the choice, they
clearly would go for another.
A
meta-analysis incorporating research from 50 independent studies found no
meaningful connection between choice and anxiety, but speculated that the
variance in the studies left open the possibility that choice overload could
be tied to certain highly specific and as yet poorly understood
pre-conditions.
|
Advertisements are an attempt to brainwash customers. | |
POINT
|
COUNTERPOINT
|
People
cannot just choose to ignore advertising, because advertisers use many
underhand methods to get their message across. Posters have attention
grabbing words, or provocative pictures. Some adverts today are even being
hidden in what seem like pieces or art or public information so people don't
realise they are being marketed to. The introduction of digital screens
allows businesses to alter their advertising to respond to specific events,
making advertisements not only everywhere, but seemingly all-knowing. By
targeting people's unconscious thoughts adverts are a form of brainwashing
that take away people's freedoms to make choices.
|
Adverts
which use very sly methods like subliminal images (images which are shown so
quickly the viewer doesn't consciously realise they saw them) are already
banned. The other forms of advertising are just companies being creative.
There is no difference from supermarkets being painted bright colours to make
their food seem more appetising or even people wearing make-up to improve
their image. People make unconscious judgements all the time, and we
frequently try to influence these choices by the way we present ourselves. This isn't
brainwashing, so neither is advertising
|
Advertisements try to make people feel bad about not having the product. | |
POINT
|
COUNTERPOINT
|
Many
adverts do more than just advertising products. Some try to make people feel
inferior if they don't have the product, or if they have something which the
product would change. Perceptions of beauty and fashion in particular have
been terribly distorted. Many young people have low self-esteem, and lead
unhealthy lifestyles because they feel they should be thinner and more
attractive like the models they see in adverts. This leads to serious
problems like eating-disorders and self-harm. Research that proved this
effect also concluded that 'the media can boost self-esteem (happiness with
one's self) where it is providing examples of a variety of body shapes.
However, it often tends to portray a limited (small) number of body shapes'
|
The
media and celebrity magazines do much more harm, by mocking unattractive or
overweight people, and glorifying models who are often dangerously thin.
Adverts never criticise people - that would be terrible for the companies
behind them. Their aim is to understand and provide what people want, and so
their adverts only ever reflect what people think. If people's perceptions
are wrong, then it not the advertisers' job to put them right, but
politicians, the media and schools.
|
Advertisements tell children that they should have everything they want. | |
POINT
|
COUNTERPOINT
|
Advertising
gives the impression, especially to children, that they can and should have
everything they want. This makes people too interested in material things.
People are becoming more selfish and obsessed with their possessions, and
losing their values of patience, hard work, moderation and the importance of
non-material things like family and friends. This harms their relationships
and their personal development, which has serious effects for society as a
whole.
|
Our
society is built around the idea that companies produce things that people
want, and this is what makes us prosperous. If consumers suddenly stopped
wanting to buy so many products then what happens to the people whose job it
is to make them? The economy will suffer terribly. Of course some people take
materialism too far, but most people buy just what they need and then a
little extra when they treat themselves. This is a much better situation than
one in which people can only afford to buy the things they need - that would
be a step backwards.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment